PDF in three dimensions

Posted on April 23, 2018 | 1 comment

There are two ways to put 3D models into a PDF file. Neither of them is an extension of the two-dimensional PDF model. Rather, they’re technologies which were developed independently, which can be wrapped into a PDF, and which software such as Adobe Acrobat can work with.

PDF has become a container format as much as a representational format. It can hold anything, and some of the things it holds have more or less official status, but there are no common architectural principles. The two formats used with PDF are U3D and PRC. Both are actually independent file formats which a PDF can embed.
Continue reading →

1 Comment

Posted in commentary

Tagged , ,

Apple hides attachments in malformed multipart mail

Posted on April 9, 2018 | Comments Off on Apple hides attachments in malformed multipart mail

Recently I got a PDF of a filk songbook which I had contributed to. More precisely, the email said I was getting it, but there was no sign of an attachment. I wrote back to the editor who’d sent it, and she insisted it was there. Digging it out of the message revealed to me a whole new way of messing up email formats.

A quick look at the message source showed that there really was an attachment with Content-Type of “application/pdf” which took up well over 90% of the message. The question was why Thunderbird didn’t show it to me.
Continue reading →

Comments Off on Apple hides attachments in malformed multipart mail

Posted in commentary, Personal

Tagged ,

PDF/L?

Posted on March 21, 2018 | 2 comments

Here’s a question for the gallery: Have any of you heard of PDF/L, and do you know what it is?
Continue reading →

2 Comments

Posted in Query

Tagged ,

Google Docs: Not a File Format

Posted on March 15, 2018 | Comments Off on Google Docs: Not a File Format

What’s the format of a Google Docs file? The question may not even be meaningful. According to Jenny Mitcham at the University of York, there is no such thing as a Google Docs file. What you see when you open a document is an assembly of information from a database. You can export it in various file formats, but the exported file isn’t identical to the Google document.

This makes them risky from a preservation standpoint. You can’t save a local backup of a document. If you lose your Google account, or if censorship in your country cuts you off from it, you lose all your documents.
Continue reading →

Comments Off on Google Docs: Not a File Format

Posted in commentary

Tagged ,

Preserving and losing tax records

Posted on March 7, 2018 | Comments Off on Preserving and losing tax records

When you offer expert advice on something, such as digital preservation, you have to admit your own errors. I very nearly lost my 2016 tax return. When I tried to open it in TurboTax, the application just did nothing. I hadn’t exported it to a generally usable format. The TurboTax file format is proprietary and opaque.
Continue reading →

Comments Off on Preserving and losing tax records

Posted in commentary

Tagged

File corruption and political corruption

Posted on February 27, 2018 | 1 comment

When people who don’t understand file formats manipulate files in order to cover their tracks, they generally fail miserably. Slate magazine gives an entertaining case in point from the Trump scandals. The article says:

There are two types of people in this world: those who know how to convert PDFs into Word documents and those who are indicted for money laundering. Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort is the second kind of person.

The PDF Association chimes in with additional technical details.
Continue reading →

1 Comment

Posted in commentary, News

Tagged ,

The future of TIFF

Posted on February 23, 2018 | 1 comment

Is TIFF a legacy format?

The most recent version of the TIFF specification, 6.0, dates from 1992. Adobe updated it with three technical notes, the latest coming out in 2002. Since then there has been nothing.

The format is solid, but the past quarter-century has seen reasons to enhance it. BigTIFF is a variant of the format to accommodate larger files. It isn’t backward-compatible with TIFF, but the changes mostly concern data lengths and are easy to add to a TIFF interpreter. The format sits in a kind of limbo, since Adobe owns the spec but is no longer updating it. There have been new tags which have achieved consensus acceptance but don’t have official status. AWare Systems has a list of known tags but has no reliable way to say which ones are private and which are generally accepted. There’s no way to add a new compression or encryption algorithm, or any other new feature, and give it official status.
Continue reading →

1 Comment

Posted in commentary

Tagged , ,

Can a .txt file contain malware?

Posted on February 5, 2018 | Comments Off on Can a .txt file contain malware?

The Internet Crime Complaint Center reported that some email messages are impersonating it in an attempt to get malware onto target computers. That’s clearly worth knowing about, but this part of the report is odd:

The unknown actors also attached a text document (.txt) to download, complete, and return to the perpetrators. The text file contained malware which was designed to further victimize the recipient.

It really shouldn’t be possible to run malware by opening a .txt file. It should just open in a text editor, with no execution of code. There’s no further explanation.
Continue reading →

Comments Off on Can a .txt file contain malware?

Posted in commentary

Tagged

The inventor of binary encoding

Posted on January 22, 2018 | Comments Off on The inventor of binary encoding

Francis Bacon may not have written Shakespeare’s plays, but he wrote the Novum Organum, a foundational work of scientific methodology. He did something else almost as impressive: He invented the binary encoding of text. In the early 17th century he wrote:

First let all the Letters of the Alphabet, by transposition, be resolved into two Letters onely; for the transposition of two Letters by five placeings will be sufficient for 32. Differences, much more for 24. which is the number of the Alphabet . The example of such an Alphabet is on this wise.

By “transposition” he meant the use of two letters, such as A and B, as units of an encoded message. They could just as well have been 1 and 0, or any other pair. Using five letters gives 25 or 32 possible encodings. AAAAA signifies A, AAAAB is B, AAABA is C, and so on. He said there were 24 letters in the alphabet because in his time I and J were considered the same letter, as were U and V. It’s a very short hop from this encoding to Baudot, and just an extension to seven letters (bits) to get ASCII.
Continue reading →

Comments Off on The inventor of binary encoding

Posted in commentary

Tagged ,

How Twitter renders GIF

Posted on January 15, 2018 | 3 comments

I’ve long wondered how Twitter renders animated GIF files. I have Firefox set to disable GIF animation, and it works everywhere except on Twitter. Apart from that, the interface indicates something is going on beyond normal GIF display. It doesn’t animate till you hit the “Play” button, and then there’s apparently no way to stop it.
Continue reading →

3 Comments

Posted in commentary

Tagged , ,